Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect ; 83(3): 306-313, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34302864

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of co-infections and superinfections in onco-hematological patients with COVID-19. METHODS: International, multicentre cohort study of cancer patients with COVID-19. All patients were included in the analysis of co-infections at diagnosis, while only patients admitted at least 48 h were included in the analysis of superinfections. RESULTS: 684 patients were included (384 with solid tumors and 300 with hematological malignancies). Co-infections and superinfections were documented in 7.8% (54/684) and 19.1% (113/590) of patients, respectively. Lower respiratory tract infections were the most frequent infectious complications, most often caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Only seven patients developed opportunistic infections. Compared to patients without infectious complications, those with infections had worse outcomes, with high rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and case-fatality rates. Neutropenia, ICU admission and high levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were independent risk factors for infections. CONCLUSIONS: Infectious complications in cancer patients with COVID-19 were lower than expected, affecting mainly neutropenic patients with high levels of CRP and/or ICU admission. The rate of opportunistic infections was unexpectedly low. The use of empiric antimicrobials in cancer patients with COVID-19 needs to be optimized.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Neoplasias , Superinfecção , Estudos de Coortes , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(8): e0004521, 2021 07 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972253

RESUMO

To test the hypothesis that the addition of an aminoglycoside to a ß-lactam antibiotic could provide better outcomes than ß-lactam monotherapy for the initial empirical treatment of hematological neutropenic patients with subsequently documented Gram-negative bacillus (GNB) bloodstream infection (BSI), a multinational, retrospective, cohort study of GNB BSI episodes in hematological neutropenic patients in six centers (2010 to 2017) was conducted. Combination therapy (ß-lactam plus aminoglycoside) was compared to ß-lactam monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the case fatality rate, assessed at 7 and 30 days from BSI onset. Secondary endpoints were nephrotoxicity and persistent BSI. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed. Among 542 GNB BSI episodes, 304 (56%) were initially treated with combination therapy, with cefepime plus amikacin being most common (158/304 [52%]). Overall, Escherichia coli (273/304 [50.4%]) was the main etiological agent, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which predominated in the combination group (76/304 [25%] versus 28/238 [11.8%]; P < 0.001). Multidrug resistance rates were similar between groups (83/294 [28.2%] versus 63/233 [27%]; P = 0.95). In the multivariate analysis, combination therapy was associated with a lower 7-day case fatality rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.91; P = 0.035) with a tendency toward lower mortality at 30 days (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.08; P = 0.084). After PS matching, these differences remained for the 7-day case fatality rate (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.82; P = 0.017). In addition, aminoglycoside use was not significantly associated with renal function impairment (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.26 to 4.87; P = 0.9). The addition of an aminoglycoside to the initial empirical therapy regimen for febrile neutropenic hematological patients should be considered.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Sepse , Aminoglicosídeos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(7): 833-841, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32246995

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While fungaemia caused by two or more different species of yeasts (mixed fungaemia, MF) is infrequent, it might be underestimated. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the incidence of MF, clinical characteristics of the patients, and antifungal susceptibility profiles of the isolates with a systematic review of the literature. SOURCES: Data sources were PubMed and Scopus. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting ten or more mixed fungaemia episodes. CONTENT: Study included MF episodes in adults between January 2000 and August 2018 in Hacettepe University Hospitals, Turkey. The isolation, identification and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of the isolates were by standard mycological methods. Patient data were obtained retrospectively. Literature search was performed using relevant keywords according to PRISMA systematic review guidelines. A total of 32 patients with 33 MF episodes were identified. Among all fungaemia episodes, MF incidence was 3.7% (33/883). All patients had one or more underlying disorders among which solid-organ cancer (50.0%, 16/32) was the most common. Overall mortality was 51.5% (17/33). The most preferred antifungal agents for initial treatment were fluconazole (48.5%, 16/33) and echinocandins (39.4%, 13/33). Fluconazole susceptible-dose-dependent (S-DD) or -resistant Candida species were detected in 15 episodes, and an isolate of C. parapsilosis was classified as S-DD by AFST. All Candida isolates were susceptible to echinocandins. Non-candida yeasts with intrinsic resistance/reduced susceptibility to both echinocandins and fluconazole were detected in two episodes. Systematic review of the literature revealed 24 studies that reported more than ten MF episodes. Methodology was variable. Improvement of detection rates was reported when chromogenic agars were used. Most studies underlined detection of isolates with reduced susceptibility. IMPLICATIONS: Although rare, the MF rate is affected by the detection methods, which have improved in recent years. Fluconazole and echinocandins were used for initial treatment in accordance with the current guideline recommendations; however, isolates non-susceptible to both were detected. Detection of a mixed infection offers an opportunity for optimum treatment.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Coinfecção/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Fúngica/efeitos dos fármacos , Fungemia/tratamento farmacológico , Leveduras/classificação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Coinfecção/mortalidade , Feminino , Fungemia/microbiologia , Fungemia/mortalidade , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia/epidemiologia , Leveduras/efeitos dos fármacos , Leveduras/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...